On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:49 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
wrote:
>
> On 21/6/21 10:47 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 07:03:27PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
> >> index 86d4b72e95cb..0c64a77c67a6 1006
On 21/6/21 10:47 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 07:03:27PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
index 86d4b72e95cb..0c64a77c67a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
@@ -384,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 07:03:27PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote:
> Currently, direct copies of drm_file->master pointers should be
> protected by drm_device.master_mutex when being dereferenced. This is
> because drm_file->master is not invariant for the lifetime of
> drm_file. If drm_file is
Currently, direct copies of drm_file->master pointers should be
protected by drm_device.master_mutex when being dereferenced. This is
because drm_file->master is not invariant for the lifetime of
drm_file. If drm_file is not the creator of master, then
drm_file->is_master is false, and a call to dr
