Hi,
On 3/11/19 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:09:47AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:48 PM Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:15:20PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
Hi,
On 3/5/19 18:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 6:11 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:09:47AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:48 PM Maxime Ripard
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:15:20PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On 3/5/19 18:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:09:47AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:48 PM Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:15:20PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 3/5/19 18:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > On 05/03/2019 15:53, Maxime Ripard wrote
Hi,
On 3/5/19 18:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 05/03/2019 15:53, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>>> On 2/11/19 17:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The current DT bindings assume that the DMA will be performed by the
devices through
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:48 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:15:20PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 3/5/19 18:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 05/03/2019 15:53, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Georgi Dja
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:15:20PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/5/19 18:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 05/03/2019 15:53, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> >>> On 2/11/19 17:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The curr
On 05/03/2019 15:53, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
On 2/11/19 17:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The current DT bindings assume that the DMA will be performed by the
devices through their parent DT node, and rely on that assumption for the
add
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> On 2/11/19 17:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The current DT bindings assume that the DMA will be performed by the
> > devices through their parent DT node, and rely on that assumption for the
> > address translation using dma-range
Hi Maxime,
On 2/11/19 17:02, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The current DT bindings assume that the DMA will be performed by the
> devices through their parent DT node, and rely on that assumption for the
> address translation using dma-ranges.
>
> However, some SoCs have devices that will perform DMA th
The current DT bindings assume that the DMA will be performed by the
devices through their parent DT node, and rely on that assumption for the
address translation using dma-ranges.
However, some SoCs have devices that will perform DMA through another bus,
with separate address translation rules. W
10 matches
Mail list logo