On 11/18/2013 01:57 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:15:57PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi Thierry,
I have already sent patch w
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:15:57PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >> Hi Thierry,
> >>
> >> I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1].
> >> It was posted
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:59:23AM +, Bert Kenward wrote:
> On 11/18/2013 11:22, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:04:19PM +, Bert Kenward wrote:
> > > #define DSI_WINDOW_VFP (1 << 0)
> > > #define DSI_WINDOW_ACT (1 << 1)
> > > #define DSI_WINDOW_VBP (1 << 2)
> > > #de
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:04:19PM +, Bert Kenward wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 14:16, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> > On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > Furthermore I think if we kept the transfer function proposed
> > > in my patch should make it easier to address Bert's comments from yo
On 11/18/2013 11:22, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:04:19PM +, Bert Kenward wrote:
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_VFP (1 << 0)
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_ACT (1 << 1)
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_VBP (1 << 2)
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_VSY (1 << 3)
> >
> > /**
> > * struct dsi_msg - DSI comm
Hi Thierry,
On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1].
>> It was posted as the first step of CDF implementation attempt,
>> but in fact it do not depe
On 11/14/2013 14:16, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Furthermore I think if we kept the transfer function proposed
> > in my patch should make it easier to address Bert's comments from your
> > posting.
> I am not sure which part of Barts comment you are ad
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1].
> It was posted as the first step of CDF implementation attempt,
> but in fact it do not depend on CDF.
>
> [1]
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel at li
Hi Thierry,
I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1].
It was posted as the first step of CDF implementation attempt,
but in fact it do not depend on CDF.
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org/msg45252.html
One comment below.
On 11/11/2013 01:00 PM,
In order to support DSI peripherals, add a DSI bus type that devices and
drivers can be registered with.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 4 +
drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsi.c | 306 ++
include
10 matches
Mail list logo