[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-18 Thread Andrzej Hajda
On 11/18/2013 01:57 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:15:57PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> Hi Thierry, >> >> On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: Hi Thierry, I have already sent patch w

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-18 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:15:57PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> Hi Thierry, > >> > >> I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1]. > >> It was posted

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-18 Thread Thierry Reding
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:59:23AM +, Bert Kenward wrote: > On 11/18/2013 11:22, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:04:19PM +, Bert Kenward wrote: > > > #define DSI_WINDOW_VFP (1 << 0) > > > #define DSI_WINDOW_ACT (1 << 1) > > > #define DSI_WINDOW_VBP (1 << 2) > > > #de

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-18 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:04:19PM +, Bert Kenward wrote: > On 11/14/2013 14:16, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > Furthermore I think if we kept the transfer function proposed > > > in my patch should make it easier to address Bert's comments from yo

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-18 Thread Bert Kenward
On 11/18/2013 11:22, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:04:19PM +, Bert Kenward wrote: > > #define DSI_WINDOW_VFP (1 << 0) > > #define DSI_WINDOW_ACT (1 << 1) > > #define DSI_WINDOW_VBP (1 << 2) > > #define DSI_WINDOW_VSY (1 << 3) > > > > /** > > * struct dsi_msg - DSI comm

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-14 Thread Andrzej Hajda
Hi Thierry, On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> Hi Thierry, >> >> I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1]. >> It was posted as the first step of CDF implementation attempt, >> but in fact it do not depe

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-14 Thread Bert Kenward
On 11/14/2013 14:16, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 11/13/2013 10:38 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > Furthermore I think if we kept the transfer function proposed > > in my patch should make it easier to address Bert's comments from your > > posting. > I am not sure which part of Barts comment you are ad

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-13 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1]. > It was posted as the first step of CDF implementation attempt, > but in fact it do not depend on CDF. > > [1] > http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel at li

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-12 Thread Andrzej Hajda
Hi Thierry, I have already sent patch with DSI bus implementation [1]. It was posted as the first step of CDF implementation attempt, but in fact it do not depend on CDF. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org/msg45252.html One comment below. On 11/11/2013 01:00 PM,

[PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add DSI bus infrastructure

2013-11-11 Thread Thierry Reding
In order to support DSI peripherals, add a DSI bus type that devices and drivers can be registered with. Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 4 + drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dsi.c | 306 ++ include