On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:24:20PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 23:01 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:32:27PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > While having the modeset_retry_work in intel_connector makes sense with
> > > SST, this paradigm doesn't make a
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 23:01 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:32:27PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > While having the modeset_retry_work in intel_connector makes sense with
> > SST, this paradigm doesn't make a whole ton of sense when it comes to
> > MST since we have to deal w
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:32:27PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> While having the modeset_retry_work in intel_connector makes sense with
> SST, this paradigm doesn't make a whole ton of sense when it comes to
> MST since we have to deal with multiple connectors. In most cases, it's
> more useful to ju
While having the modeset_retry_work in intel_connector makes sense with
SST, this paradigm doesn't make a whole ton of sense when it comes to
MST since we have to deal with multiple connectors. In most cases, it's
more useful to just use the intel_dp struct since it indicates whether
or not we're d
