On Monday, January 22, 2024 6:50:31 PM CET Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:26:04PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > On Monday, January 22, 2024 5:57:53 PM CET Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > > On Monday, January 22, 2024 5:50:11 PM CET Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > > AFAICT nothing wil
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:26:04PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> On Monday, January 22, 2024 5:57:53 PM CET Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > On Monday, January 22, 2024 5:50:11 PM CET Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > AFAICT nothing will inhibit setting GPIOLIB so allyes- and allmodconfig
> > > builds will al
On Monday, January 22, 2024 5:57:53 PM CET Duje Mihanović wrote:
> On Monday, January 22, 2024 5:50:11 PM CET Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > AFAICT nothing will inhibit setting GPIOLIB so allyes- and allmodconfig
> > builds will always end up with GPIOLIB enabled. If we are happy to
> > select it then
On Monday, January 22, 2024 5:50:11 PM CET Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > I believe a "select" would be more appropriate here unless these
backlights
> > should be hidden if GPIOLIB is disabled. The catch with "select" is that
> > there
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> On Monday, January 22, 2024 11:19:26 AM CET Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > > index 6292fddcc55c..d29b6823e
On Monday, January 22, 2024 11:19:26 AM CET Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > index 6292fddcc55c..d29b6823e7d1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> The ExpressWire protocol is shared between at least KTD2692 and KTD2801
> with slight differences such as timings and the former not having a
> defined set of pulses for enabling the protocol (possibly because it
> does not support P
On Sunday, January 21, 2024 3:35:46 PM CET Linus Walleij wrote:
> > +extern void expresswire_power_off(struct expresswire_common_props
*props);
> > +extern void expresswire_enable(struct expresswire_common_props *props);
> > +extern void expresswire_start(struct expresswire_common_props *props);
>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:27 PM Duje Mihanović wrote:
> The ExpressWire protocol is shared between at least KTD2692 and KTD2801
> with slight differences such as timings and the former not having a
> defined set of pulses for enabling the protocol (possibly because it
> does not support PWM unli
The ExpressWire protocol is shared between at least KTD2692 and KTD2801
with slight differences such as timings and the former not having a
defined set of pulses for enabling the protocol (possibly because it
does not support PWM unlike KTD2801). Despite these differences the
ExpressWire handling c
10 matches
Mail list logo
