On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 23:37, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> No compatible string for it yet, just the version-dependent changes.
> They've now tied the hub and the core interrupt lines into a single
> interrupt line coming out of the block. It also turns out I made a
> mistake in modeling the V3D v3.3 a
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 16:51, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Dave Emett writes:
>
> > Sorry, a few things I thought of after sending the Reviewed-by email...
> >
> >> + v3d->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(v3d->reset)) {
> >> + ret = PTR_ERR
Sorry, a few things I thought of after sending the Reviewed-by email...
> + v3d->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(v3d->reset)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(v3d->reset);
> +
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + got
Eric Anholt writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> Dave Emett writes:
>
>> Sorry, a few things I thought of after sending the Reviewed-by email...
>>
>>> + v3d->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(v3d->reset)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(v3
Dave Emett writes:
> Sorry, a few things I thought of after sending the Reviewed-by email...
>
>> + v3d->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(v3d->reset)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(v3d->reset);
>> +
>> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
No compatible string for it yet, just the version-dependent changes.
They've now tied the hub and the core interrupt lines into a single
interrupt line coming out of the block. It also turns out I made a
mistake in modeling the V3D v3.3 and v4.1 bridge as a part of V3D
itself -- the bridge is goin
