Hi Rahul,
On Thursday 20 of June 2013 07:41:53 Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Hi Tomasz, Lucas,
>
> How does this patch look to you ? Please share your views.
Looks fine now. Have my
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa
for the whole series.
Best regards,
Tomasz
> regards,
> Rahul Sharma.
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2
Hi Tomasz, Lucas,
How does this patch look to you ? Please share your views.
regards,
Rahul Sharma.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Rahul Sharma
wrote:
> This patch adds new combatible strings for hdmi, mixer, ddc
> and hdmiphy. It follows the convention of using compatible string
> which rep
Hi Rahul,
On Thursday 20 of June 2013 07:41:53 Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Hi Tomasz, Lucas,
>
> How does this patch look to you ? Please share your views.
Looks fine now. Have my
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa
for the whole series.
Best regards,
Tomasz
> regards,
> Rahul Sharma.
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2
Hi Tomasz, Lucas,
How does this patch look to you ? Please share your views.
regards,
Rahul Sharma.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> This patch adds new combatible strings for hdmi, mixer, ddc
> and hdmiphy. It follows the convention of using compatible string
> which repr
This patch adds new combatible strings for hdmi, mixer, ddc
and hdmiphy. It follows the convention of using compatible string
which represent the SoC in which the IP was added for the first
time.
Drivers continue to support the previous compatible strings
but further addition of these compatible s
This patch adds new combatible strings for hdmi, mixer, ddc
and hdmiphy. It follows the convention of using compatible string
which represent the SoC in which the IP was added for the first
time.
Drivers continue to support the previous compatible strings
but further addition of these compatible s
