Hi Boris,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:45:00PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
>
> This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
> negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
> Thi
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:05:16 +0100
Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > void drm_bridge_add(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
> > void drm_bridge_remove(struct drm_bridge *bridge);
> > struct drm_bridge *of_drm_find_bridge(struct device_node *np);
> > @@ -475,6 +543,56 @@ void drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable
On 23/10/2019 17:45, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
>
> This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
> negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
> This patch just paves the road for such a feature by adding a
On 23/10/2019 17:45, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
>
> This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
> negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
> This patch just paves the road for such a feature by adding a
One of the last remaining objects to not have its atomic state.
This is being motivated by our attempt to support runtime bus-format
negotiation between elements of the bridge chain.
This patch just paves the road for such a feature by adding a new
drm_bridge_state object inheriting from drm_priva
