On 10/17/2022 6:37 AM, Caleb Connolly wrote:
On 17/10/2022 09:59, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2022-10-13 09:02:44, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 10/13/2022 2:36 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2022-10-12 16:03:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
[..]
But I would like to hold back this change till Vinod clarifi
On 17/10/2022 09:59, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2022-10-13 09:02:44, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> On 10/13/2022 2:36 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> On 2022-10-12 16:03:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
[..]
But I would like to hold back this change till Vinod clarifies because
Vinod had mentione
On 2022-10-13 09:02:44, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> On 10/13/2022 2:36 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-10-12 16:03:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >> [..]
> >> But I would like to hold back this change till Vinod clarifies because
> >> Vinod had mentioned that with drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters() he wa
On 10/13/2022 2:36 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2022-10-12 16:03:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 10/9/2022 11:50 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
As per the FIXME this code is entirely duplicate with what is already
provided inside drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(), and it is yet unknown
why this comme
On 2022-10-12 16:03:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/2022 11:50 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > As per the FIXME this code is entirely duplicate with what is already
> > provided inside drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(), and it is yet unknown
> > why this comment was put in place instead of res
On 10/9/2022 11:50 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
As per the FIXME this code is entirely duplicate with what is already
provided inside drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(), and it is yet unknown
why this comment was put in place instead of resolved from the get-go.
Not only does it save on duplication,
On 2022-10-09 20:50:54, Marijn Suijten wrote:
Apologies. After attempting to recover from an unexpected interruption
_right as I was sending this series_, this patch got sent twice as it
only later appeared to also have made its way through in the first round
[1], together with the cover letter a
On 09/10/2022 21:48, Marijn Suijten wrote:
As per the FIXME this code is entirely duplicate with what is already
provided inside drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(), and it is yet unknown
why this comment was put in place instead of resolved from the get-go.
Not only does it save on duplication, it w
As per the FIXME this code is entirely duplicate with what is already
provided inside drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(), and it is yet unknown
why this comment was put in place instead of resolved from the get-go.
Not only does it save on duplication, it would have also spared certain
issues.
For ex
As per the FIXME this code is entirely duplicate with what is already
provided inside drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters(), and it is yet unknown
why this comment was put in place instead of resolved from the get-go.
Not only does it save on duplication, it would have also spared certain
issues.
For ex
10 matches
Mail list logo
