Shawn Guo writes:
> From: Shawn Guo
>
> Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
> letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
> function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_counter assignment in the driver
> code becomes redundant and can be r
Hi Shawn,
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:16 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> From: Shawn Guo
>
> Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
> letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
> function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_counter assignment in the
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On an unrelated note, for security reasons we should try to make the driver
> structure static, or at least move ops to a static structure.
ITYM "const" not "static".
"static" doesn't get you anything from a security point of vi
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:16:14PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
For:
> drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_drv.c | 1 -
Acked-by: Russell King
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:16:14PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> From: Shawn Guo
>
> Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
> letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
> function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_counter assignment in the driv
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:44:49AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On an unrelated note, for security reasons we should try to make the driver
> > structure static, or at least move ops to a static structure.
>
> ITYM
Hi Russell,
On Tuesday 07 Feb 2017 10:44:49 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On an unrelated note, for security reasons we should try to make the
> > driver
> > structure static, or at least move ops to a static structure.
>
>
Hi Shawn,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 07 Feb 2017 17:16:14 Shawn Guo wrote:
> From: Shawn Guo
>
> Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
> letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
> function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_cou
On 02/07/2017 10:16 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> From: Shawn Guo
>
> Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
> letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
> function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_counter assignment in the driver
> code becomes
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:16:14 +0800
Shawn Guo wrote:
> From: Shawn Guo
>
> Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
> letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
> function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_counter assignment in the driver
>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:16:14PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> From: Shawn Guo
>
> Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
> letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
> function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_counter assignment in the driv
From: Shawn Guo
Core code already makes drm_driver.get_vblank_counter hook optional by
letting drm_vblank_no_hw_counter be the default implementation for the
function hook. So the drm_vblank_no_hw_counter assignment in the driver
code becomes redundant and can be removed now.
Signed-off-by: Sha
12 matches
Mail list logo
