On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 08:32 +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:46:41 +0900
> Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
> > Hi Boris, Neil,
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 17:44 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > This patch series aims at adding support for runtime bus-format
> > > negotiation
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:46:41 +0900
Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Boris, Neil,
>
> On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 17:44 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > This patch series aims at adding support for runtime bus-format
> > negotiation between all elements of the
> > 'encoder -> bridges -> connector/display'
Hi Boris, Neil,
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 17:44 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> This patch series aims at adding support for runtime bus-format
> negotiation between all elements of the
> 'encoder -> bridges -> connector/display' section of the pipeline.
>
> In order to support that, we need drm brid
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:27:16 +0200
Neil Armstrong wrote:
> hi Boris,
>
> On 23/10/2019 17:44, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > This patch series aims at adding support for runtime bus-format
> > negotiation between all elements of the
> > 'encoder -> bridges -> connector/display' section of the pipeli
hi Boris,
On 23/10/2019 17:44, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> This patch series aims at adding support for runtime bus-format
> negotiation between all elements of the
> 'encoder -> bridges -> connector/display' section of the pipeline.
>
> In order to support that, we need drm bridges to fully take pa
This patch series aims at adding support for runtime bus-format
negotiation between all elements of the
'encoder -> bridges -> connector/display' section of the pipeline.
In order to support that, we need drm bridges to fully take part in the
atomic state validation process, which requires adding
