Hi,
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:55 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:19:18PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The goal of this patch series is to move away from hardcoding exact
> > eDP panels in device tree files. As discussed in the various patches
> > in thi
Hi Douglas,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:19:18PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The goal of this patch series is to move away from hardcoding exact
> eDP panels in device tree files. As discussed in the various patches
> in this series (I'm not repeating everything here), most eDP panels
> are 99%
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:10 PM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
> Removed most CC: SMTP server protested.
Yeah, it was because of the dang defconfig patches. My general policy
is to send the cover letter to everyone even if not everyone gets CCed
on all patches, but it ended up as a lot... Speaking of
Removed most CC: SMTP server protested.
On 01.09.2021 22:19, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The goal of this patch series is to move away from hardcoding exact
> eDP panels in device tree files. As discussed in the various patches
> in this series (I'm not repeating everything here), most eDP panels
The goal of this patch series is to move away from hardcoding exact
eDP panels in device tree files. As discussed in the various patches
in this series (I'm not repeating everything here), most eDP panels
are 99% probable and we can get that last 1% by allowing two "power
up" delays to be specified
