Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-03-10 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Hi Andrew! > Really, an acked-by would have been much easier all around, but > whatever. Hard to keep track of which of these kernel-wide series go through one tree and which ones don't. I generally err on the side of picking up things which may conflict with driver updates in my tree. Judging

Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-03-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:19:03 -0400 "Martin K. Petersen" wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:17:14 +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > > > This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of > > msecs_to_jiffies() that > > either use the multiply pattern of either of: > > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1

Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-03-10 Thread Martin K. Petersen
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:17:14 +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() > that > either use the multiply pattern of either of: > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC) > > where N is a constant or an

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-02-27 Thread Carlos Maiolino
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:38:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:29:53 + Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:17:14PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > > > This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of > > > msecs_to_jiffies() that > > > eithe

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-02-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:38:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:29:53 + Mark Brown wrote: > > Please don't combine patches for multiple subsystems into a single > > series if there's no dependencies between them, it just creates > > confusion about how things get merge

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-02-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:29:53 + Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:17:14PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > > This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of > > msecs_to_jiffies() that > > either use the multiply pattern of either of: > > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or

Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-02-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:17:14 +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() > that > either use the multiply pattern of either of: > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC) > > where N is a constant or an e

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-02-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:17:14PM +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() > that > either use the multiply pattern of either of: > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC) > > where N is a constant o

Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-02-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:17:14 +, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() > that > either use the multiply pattern of either of: > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC) > > where N is a constant or an

[PATCH v3 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

2025-02-25 Thread Easwar Hariharan
This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() that either use the multiply pattern of either of: - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC) where N is a constant or an expression, to avoid the multiplication. The conversion is made with Cocci