Hi Janusz,
thanks for a quick response.
> > throughout the series you modify the code right after
> > introducing it.
>
> Yes, that split among patches reflects my way of getting to a solution that
> not only resolves the issue but also tries to address comments I got and take
> care of resul
Hi Krzysztof,
Thank you for looking at it.
On Thursday, 6 March 2025 12:00:40 CET Krzysztof Karas wrote:
> Hi Janusz,
>
> throughout the series you modify the code right after
> introducing it.
Yes, that split among patches reflects my way of getting to a solution that
not only resolves the i
Hi Janusz,
throughout the series you modify the code right after
introducing it. How about changing the order of things a bit:
1) order the functions in a symmetrical way between
register/unregister steps and group them as you see necessary,
(At that point you would not be fixing the issue ye
Starting with commit ec3e00b4ee27 ("drm/i915: stop registering if
drm_dev_register() fails"), we may return from i915_driver_register()
immediately, skipping remaining registration steps. However, the
_unregister() counterpart called at device remove knows nothing about that
skip and executes reve
