Hi Rob,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:20:09 -0400
Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Boris BREZILLON
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200
> > Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200
Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when
> calling drm_flip_work_queue from atomic contexts.
>
> The 2nd patch of this series is optional, as it only reworks
> drm_flip_work_init prototype
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Boris BREZILLON
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:06:06 +0200
> Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when
>> calling drm_flip_work_queue from atomic contexts.
>>
>> The 2nd patch of this s
Hello,
This patch series reworks the flip-work framework to make it safe when
calling drm_flip_work_queue from atomic contexts.
The 2nd patch of this series is optional, as it only reworks
drm_flip_work_init prototype to remove unneeded size argument and
return code (this function cannot fail any