On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:43:52PM +0100, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd appreciate if you could take a look at this patch. I believe I
> have accommodated the earlier review comments.
Sorry, it was sitting on my todo list. Looks good.
> Thank you,
> Bas
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:5
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:57:10AM +0100, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> This
>
> 1) Enables core DRM syncobj support.
> 2) Adds options to the submission ioctl to wait/signal syncobjs.
>
> Just like the wait fence fd, this does inline waits. Using the
> scheduler would be nice but I believe it is ou
Hi,
I'd appreciate if you could take a look at this patch. I believe I
have accommodated the earlier review comments.
Thank you,
Bas
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:58 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
>
> This
>
> 1) Enables core DRM syncobj support.
> 2) Adds options to the submission ioctl to wait/sign
This
1) Enables core DRM syncobj support.
2) Adds options to the submission ioctl to wait/signal syncobjs.
Just like the wait fence fd, this does inline waits. Using the
scheduler would be nice but I believe it is out of scope for
this work.
Support for timeline syncobjs is implemented and the i
