On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 16:49:24 CEST schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> >
> > > The "atomic" API allows us to configure PWM period and duty_cycle and
> > > enable it in one call.
> > >
> >
Hi Lee,
Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 16:49:24 CEST schrieb Lee Jones:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>
> > The "atomic" API allows us to configure PWM period and duty_cycle and
> > enable it in one call.
> >
> > The patch also moves the pwm_init_state just before any use
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> The "atomic" API allows us to configure PWM period and duty_cycle and
> enable it in one call.
>
> The patch also moves the pwm_init_state just before any use of the
> pwm_state struct, this fixes a potential bug where pwm_get_state
> can be ca
Am Dienstag, 14. August 2018, 18:50:59 CEST schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
> The "atomic" API allows us to configure PWM period and duty_cycle and
> enable it in one call.
>
> The patch also moves the pwm_init_state just before any use of the
> pwm_state struct, this fixes a potential bug where p
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 06:50:59PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> The "atomic" API allows us to configure PWM period and duty_cycle and
> enable it in one call.
>
> The patch also moves the pwm_init_state just before any use of the
> pwm_state struct, this fixes a potential bug where pwm_g
The "atomic" API allows us to configure PWM period and duty_cycle and
enable it in one call.
The patch also moves the pwm_init_state just before any use of the
pwm_state struct, this fixes a potential bug where pwm_get_state
can be called before pwm_init_state.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Ser
