On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 16:50 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> Looks this needs some backmerge first to apply, I'll include this
> for -next pull later.
I usually base these patches on gvt-staging. If there is some other branch to
rebase them onto to make your life easier, just point me to it.
> Thanks
On 2020.02.17 17:38:58 +0100, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> Instead of defining KVMGT per-device state in struct intel_vgpu
> directly, add an indirection. This makes the GVT code oblivious of
> what state KVMGT needs to keep.
>
> The intention here is to eventually make it possible to build
> hypervi
Instead of defining KVMGT per-device state in struct intel_vgpu
directly, add an indirection. This makes the GVT code oblivious of
what state KVMGT needs to keep.
The intention here is to eventually make it possible to build
hypervisor backends for the mediator, without having to touch the
mediato
