> On May 8, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> IIRC "LFC191: Compliance Basics for Developers" was pretty clear that
> the copyright line should stay.
> If so, vmware_pack_end.h should also have it's copyright line reinstated.
That's an interesting argument to have. Two points from my si
Hi Dirk,
On 7 May 2018 at 00:16, Dirk Hohndel (VMware) wrote:
> These files are licensed under GPL-2.0.
> Removing the MIT boilerplate as that really didn't make any sense for
> those two header files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel (VMware)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:50:42PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>
> Do you want me to take patch 7 and 8 through a vmwgfx pull request?
I'm happy to follow any process that the different sub-teams here prefer.
I sent this out as one series as it clearly is connected, but if you'd
rather have th
On 05/07/2018 01:16 AM, Dirk Hohndel (VMware) wrote:
These files are licensed under GPL-2.0.
Removing the MIT boilerplate as that really didn't make any sense for
those two header files.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel (VMware)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig| 1 +
.../vmwgfx
These files are licensed under GPL-2.0.
Removing the MIT boilerplate as that really didn't make any sense for
those two header files.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel (VMware)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig| 1 +
.../vmwgfx/device_include/vmware_pack_begin.h | 25 +---
