Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/vmwgfx: Abstract placement selection

2023-03-14 Thread Dave Airlie
> > > > Problem with explicit placement selection in vmwgfx is that by the time > > the buffer object needs to be validated the information about which > > placement was supposed to be used is lost. To workaround this the driver > > had a bunch of state in various places e.g. as_mob or cpu_blit to

Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/vmwgfx: Abstract placement selection

2023-01-31 Thread "Maaz Mombasawala (VMware)
On 1/30/23 19:35, Zack Rusin wrote: > From: Zack Rusin > > Problem with explicit placement selection in vmwgfx is that by the time > the buffer object needs to be validated the information about which > placement was supposed to be used is lost. To workaround this the driver > had a bunch of stat

Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/vmwgfx: Abstract placement selection

2023-01-31 Thread Martin Krastev (VMware)
From: Martin Krastev LGTM Reviewed-by: Martin Krastev Regards, Martin On 31.01.23 г. 5:35 ч., Zack Rusin wrote: From: Zack Rusin Problem with explicit placement selection in vmwgfx is that by the time the buffer object needs to be validated the information about which placement was supp

[PATCH v2 7/8] drm/vmwgfx: Abstract placement selection

2023-01-30 Thread Zack Rusin
From: Zack Rusin Problem with explicit placement selection in vmwgfx is that by the time the buffer object needs to be validated the information about which placement was supposed to be used is lost. To workaround this the driver had a bunch of state in various places e.g. as_mob or cpu_blit to s