May I suggest the following for the device tree binding? (I'm not very
familiar w/ device trees, so apologies for any oversights, but trying
to process the feedback here and help move Mediatek along). This
should align with my other suggestions for having an MTK specific
portion to their secure hea
On 13/11/2023 6:37 am, Yong Wu (吴勇) wrote:
[...]
+properties:
+ compatible:
+const: secure_cma_region
Still wrong compatible. Look at other bindings - there is nowhere
underscore. Look at other reserved memory bindings especially.
Also, CMA is a Linux thingy, so either not suitable for bi
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 19:15:57 +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> Add a binding for describing the secure CMA reserved memory range. The
> memory range also will be defined in the TEE firmware. It means the TEE
> will be configured with the same address/size that is being set in this
> DT node.
>
> Signed-of
On Sat, 2023-11-11 at 13:48 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> On 11/11/2023 12:15, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Add a binding for describing the secure CMA reserved memory range.
On 11/11/2023 12:15, Yong Wu wrote:
> Add a binding for describing the secure CMA reserved memory range. The
> memory range also will be defined in the TEE firmware. It means the TEE
> will be configured with the same address/size that is being set in this
> DT node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu
>
Add a binding for describing the secure CMA reserved memory range. The
memory range also will be defined in the TEE firmware. It means the TEE
will be configured with the same address/size that is being set in this
DT node.
Signed-off-by: Yong Wu
---
.../reserved-memory/secure_cma_region.yaml
