Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/panthor: Make getting GPU model name simple and extensible

2025-04-10 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:20:59 +0100 Karunika Choo wrote: > On 21/03/2025 08:02, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:17:37 + > > Karunika Choo wrote: > > > >> This patch replaces the previous panthor_model structure with a simple > >> switch case based on the product_id, which

Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/panthor: Make getting GPU model name simple and extensible

2025-04-10 Thread Karunika Choo
On 21/03/2025 08:02, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:17:37 + > Karunika Choo wrote: > >> This patch replaces the previous panthor_model structure with a simple >> switch case based on the product_id, which is in the format of: >> ((arch_major << 24) | product_major) >>

[PATCH v2 5/9] drm/panthor: Make getting GPU model name simple and extensible

2025-04-05 Thread Karunika Choo
This patch replaces the previous panthor_model structure with a simple switch case based on the product_id, which is in the format of: ((arch_major << 24) | product_major) This not only simplifies the comparison, but also allows extending the function to accommodate naming differences base

Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/panthor: Make getting GPU model name simple and extensible

2025-03-26 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:17:37 + Karunika Choo wrote: > This patch replaces the previous panthor_model structure with a simple > switch case based on the product_id, which is in the format of: > ((arch_major << 24) | product_major) > > This not only simplifies the comparison, but also