On 02/11/2013 10:00 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:27:24PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>> On 22.01.13 09:31, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>>> On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
+static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct
drm_framebuffer *fb,
>>>
On 02/11/2013 10:00 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:27:24PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
On 22.01.13 09:31, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
+static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer
*fb,
+
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:27:24PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> On 22.01.13 09:31, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> >On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>+static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct
> >>drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >>+ struct drm_pending_vblank
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:27:24PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
> On 22.01.13 09:31, Terje Bergström wrote:
> >On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>+static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct
> >>drm_framebuffer *fb,
> >>+ struct drm_pending_vblank
On 22.01.13 09:31, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> +static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer
>> *fb,
>> + struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event)
>> +{
>> +struct tegra_framebuffer *newfb = to_te
On 22.01.2013 11:48, Lucas Stach wrote:
> I think the test suite is enough to fulfil the formal requirement of
> having a working userspace. But still it would be nice to have at least
> some simple accel functions working in the DDX. Maybe just to see on how
> well the current design integrates in
On 22.01.2013 11:31, Thierry Reding wrote:
> I'm not quite sure if I remember correctly, but I think David mentioned
> something along the lines of requiring a working userspace that can be
> used to test the DRM interfaces as a prerequisite to getting this kind
> of code merged.
That's why we hav
On 22.01.2013 11:15, Lucas Stach wrote:
> But even if I get this out real soon, I'm not really comfortable with
> speeding things to 3.9. I would like to review the userspace side of
> thing a lot more thoroughly, before committing to the interface. But
> maybe this can also happen in the 3.9 RC ti
Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2013, 11:44 +0200 schrieb Terje Bergstr?m:
> On 22.01.2013 11:31, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure if I remember correctly, but I think David mentioned
> > something along the lines of requiring a working userspace that can be
> > used to test the DRM interfaces a
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:15:21AM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2013, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> > > Of course, this has the prerequisite of having support for syncpts,
> > > which I hoped we would
On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> +static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer
> *fb,
> + struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event)
> +{
> + struct tegra_framebuffer *newfb = to_tegra_fb(fb);
> + struct tegra_dc *dc = to_te
Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2013, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> > Of course, this has the prerequisite of having support for syncpts,
> > which I hoped we would get to 3.9. The review for host1x patches seem to
> > have stalled,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > +static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct
> > drm_framebuffer *fb,
> > + struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event)
> > +{
> > + struct tegra_
On 22.01.13 09:31, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
+static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer
*fb,
+ struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event)
+{
+ struct tegra_framebuffer *newfb = to_tegra_fb(f
On 22.01.2013 11:48, Lucas Stach wrote:
> I think the test suite is enough to fulfil the formal requirement of
> having a working userspace. But still it would be nice to have at least
> some simple accel functions working in the DDX. Maybe just to see on how
> well the current design integrates in
Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2013, 11:44 +0200 schrieb Terje Bergström:
> On 22.01.2013 11:31, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure if I remember correctly, but I think David mentioned
> > something along the lines of requiring a working userspace that can be
> > used to test the DRM interfaces a
On 22.01.2013 11:31, Thierry Reding wrote:
> I'm not quite sure if I remember correctly, but I think David mentioned
> something along the lines of requiring a working userspace that can be
> used to test the DRM interfaces as a prerequisite to getting this kind
> of code merged.
That's why we hav
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:15:21AM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2013, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
> > > Of course, this has the prerequisite of having support for syncpts,
> > > which I hoped we would
On 22.01.2013 11:15, Lucas Stach wrote:
> But even if I get this out real soon, I'm not really comfortable with
> speeding things to 3.9. I would like to review the userspace side of
> thing a lot more thoroughly, before committing to the interface. But
> maybe this can also happen in the 3.9 RC ti
Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2013, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
> > Of course, this has the prerequisite of having support for syncpts,
> > which I hoped we would get to 3.9. The review for host1x patches seem to
> > have stalled,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
> On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > +static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct
> > drm_framebuffer *fb,
> > + struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event)
> > +{
> > + struct tegra_
On 14.01.2013 18:06, Thierry Reding wrote:
> +static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_framebuffer
> *fb,
> + struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event)
> +{
> + struct tegra_framebuffer *newfb = to_tegra_fb(fb);
> + struct tegra_dc *dc = to_te
On 01/15/2013 12:06 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> All the necessary support bits like .mode_set_base() and VBLANK are now
> available, so page-flipping case easily be implemented on top.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
[...]
> +
> +static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_f
On 01/16/2013 07:53 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2013, 19:10 +0800 schrieb Mark Zhang:
>> I'm testing the pageflip & vblank change on cardhu. Seems the HDMI
>> doesn't work(LVDS only is OK). I'll let you know if I get something.
>>
> Just to provide another data point: I'm runnin
On 01/15/2013 12:06 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> All the necessary support bits like .mode_set_base() and VBLANK are now
> available, so page-flipping case easily be implemented on top.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
[...]
> +
> +static int tegra_dc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_f
On 01/16/2013 07:53 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2013, 19:10 +0800 schrieb Mark Zhang:
>> I'm testing the pageflip & vblank change on cardhu. Seems the HDMI
>> doesn't work(LVDS only is OK). I'll let you know if I get something.
>>
> Just to provide another data point: I'm runnin
I'm testing the pageflip & vblank change on cardhu. Seems the HDMI
doesn't work(LVDS only is OK). I'll let you know if I get something.
Mark
On 01/15/2013 12:06 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> All the necessary support bits like .mode_set_base() and VBLANK are now
> available, so page-flipping case ea
Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2013, 19:10 +0800 schrieb Mark Zhang:
> I'm testing the pageflip & vblank change on cardhu. Seems the HDMI
> doesn't work(LVDS only is OK). I'll let you know if I get something.
>
Just to provide another data point: I'm running this series and don't
see any failures with DVI
Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2013, 19:10 +0800 schrieb Mark Zhang:
> I'm testing the pageflip & vblank change on cardhu. Seems the HDMI
> doesn't work(LVDS only is OK). I'll let you know if I get something.
>
Just to provide another data point: I'm running this series and don't
see any failures with DVI
I'm testing the pageflip & vblank change on cardhu. Seems the HDMI
doesn't work(LVDS only is OK). I'll let you know if I get something.
Mark
On 01/15/2013 12:06 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> All the necessary support bits like .mode_set_base() and VBLANK are now
> available, so page-flipping case ea
All the necessary support bits like .mode_set_base() and VBLANK are now
available, so page-flipping case easily be implemented on top.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 72 +
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 9 ++
driver
All the necessary support bits like .mode_set_base() and VBLANK are now
available, so page-flipping case easily be implemented on top.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 72 +
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 9 ++
driver
32 matches
Mail list logo
