On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:50:57PM +0100, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2025-02-20 18:06:01, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:42:28PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > Dmitry Baryshkov 于2025年2月20日周四 18:39写道：
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:07:56PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> >
On 2025-02-20 18:06:01, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:42:28PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Dmitry Baryshkov 于2025年2月20日周四 18:39写道：
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:07:56PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > > There is dual DSI case that every DSI link is connected to an
> > > >
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:42:28PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Dmitry Baryshkov 于2025年2月20日周四 18:39写道：
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:07:56PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > There is dual DSI case that every DSI link is connected to an independent
> > > panel. In this dual panel case, the frame width
Dmitry Baryshkov 于2025年2月20日周四 18:39写道：
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:07:56PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > There is dual DSI case that every DSI link is connected to an independent
> > panel. In this dual panel case, the frame width for DSC on each link should
> > be halved to support the usage case
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:07:56PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> There is dual DSI case that every DSI link is connected to an independent
> panel. In this dual panel case, the frame width for DSC on each link should
> be halved to support the usage case.
Isn't it the case for the DSI panel utilizing tw
There is dual DSI case that every DSI link is connected to an independent
panel. In this dual panel case, the frame width for DSC on each link should
be halved to support the usage case.
Signed-off-by: Jun Nie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
