On 26 March 2018 at 09:29, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 08:14:35PM +0200, Stefan Schake wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > On 25 March 2018 at 02:52, Stefan Schake wrote:
>> >> +static int vc4_crtc_get_ctm_fifo(struct vc4_dev *vc4)
>> >> +{
>>
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 08:14:35PM +0200, Stefan Schake wrote:
> Hey Daniel,
>
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > On 25 March 2018 at 02:52, Stefan Schake wrote:
> >> +static int vc4_crtc_get_ctm_fifo(struct vc4_dev *vc4)
> >> +{
> >> + return VC
Hey Daniel,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 25 March 2018 at 02:52, Stefan Schake wrote:
>> +static int vc4_crtc_get_ctm_fifo(struct vc4_dev *vc4)
>> +{
>> + return VC4_GET_FIELD(HVS_READ(SCALER_OLEDOFFS),
>> +SCALER_OLE
Hi Stefan,
On 25 March 2018 at 02:52, Stefan Schake wrote:
> +static int vc4_crtc_get_ctm_fifo(struct vc4_dev *vc4)
> +{
> + return VC4_GET_FIELD(HVS_READ(SCALER_OLEDOFFS),
> +SCALER_OLEDOFFS_DISPFIFO);
> +}
This needs to be managed as a global resource through
We only have one hardware block to do the CTM and need to reject
attempts to enable it for multiple CRTCs simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schake
---
v2: No change
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c
