On Mon, 5 May 2025 08:23:26 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 05:25:16PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:39:23 +0200
> > Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:05:49PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > > > This i
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 05:25:16PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:39:23 +0200
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:05:49PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > > This is the new API for allocating DRM bridges.
> > >
> > > The devm lifetime mana
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:39:23 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:05:49PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > This is the new API for allocating DRM bridges.
> >
> > The devm lifetime management of this driver is peculiar. The underlying
> > device for the panel_bridge
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:05:49PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> This is the new API for allocating DRM bridges.
>
> The devm lifetime management of this driver is peculiar. The underlying
> device for the panel_bridge is the panel, and the devm lifetime is tied the
> panel device (panel->dev). Ho
This is the new API for allocating DRM bridges.
The devm lifetime management of this driver is peculiar. The underlying
device for the panel_bridge is the panel, and the devm lifetime is tied the
panel device (panel->dev). However the panel_bridge allocation is not
performed by the panel driver, b