On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:00:06AM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
On 29/09/2021 19:33, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Like the IS_ENABLED() counterpart, we can make IS_CONFIG_NONZERO() to
return the right thing when the config is not defined rather than a
build error, with the limitation that it can't be us
On 29/09/2021 19:33, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Like the IS_ENABLED() counterpart, we can make IS_CONFIG_NONZERO() to
> return the right thing when the config is not defined rather than a
> build error, with the limitation that it can't be used on preprocessor
> context.
>
> The trick here is that m
W dniu 30.09.2021 o 00:54, Lucas De Marchi pisze:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:08:18PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 29.09.2021 o 20:33, Lucas De Marchi pisze:
>>> Like the IS_ENABLED() counterpart, we can make IS_CONFIG_NONZERO() to
>>> return the right thing when the config is not de
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:08:18PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
W dniu 29.09.2021 o 20:33, Lucas De Marchi pisze:
Like the IS_ENABLED() counterpart, we can make IS_CONFIG_NONZERO() to
return the right thing when the config is not defined rather than a
build error, with the limitation that it can
W dniu 29.09.2021 o 20:33, Lucas De Marchi pisze:
> Like the IS_ENABLED() counterpart, we can make IS_CONFIG_NONZERO() to
> return the right thing when the config is not defined rather than a
> build error, with the limitation that it can't be used on preprocessor
> context.
>
> The trick here is
Like the IS_ENABLED() counterpart, we can make IS_CONFIG_NONZERO() to
return the right thing when the config is not defined rather than a
build error, with the limitation that it can't be used on preprocessor
context.
The trick here is that macro names can't start with a number or dash, so
we stri
