Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] accel/ivpu: remove DRIVER_DATE conditional drm_driver init

2024-12-04 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Am 04.12.24 um 15:31 schrieb Jani Nikula: The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR, and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. With the struct

[PATCH v2 2/3] accel/ivpu: remove DRIVER_DATE conditional drm_driver init

2024-12-04 Thread Jani Nikula
The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR, and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. With the struct drm_driver date member going away anyway, just

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] accel/ivpu: remove DRIVER_DATE conditional drm_driver init

2024-10-29 Thread Jacek Lawrynowicz
Reviewed-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz On 10/28/2024 7:51 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef > DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros > referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR, > and

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] accel/ivpu: remove DRIVER_DATE conditional drm_driver init

2024-10-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 2:52 PM Jani Nikula wrote: > > The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef > DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros > referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR, > and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. W

[PATCH v2 2/3] accel/ivpu: remove DRIVER_DATE conditional drm_driver init

2024-10-28 Thread Jani Nikula
The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR, and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. With the struct drm_driver date member going away anyway, just