Am 04.12.24 um 15:31 schrieb Jani Nikula:
The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef
DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros
referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR,
and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. With the struct
The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef
DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros
referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR,
and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. With the struct drm_driver date member going away
anyway, just
Reviewed-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz
On 10/28/2024 7:51 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef
> DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros
> referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR,
> and
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 2:52 PM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef
> DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros
> referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR,
> and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. W
The ivpu struct drm_driver has conditional initialization based on #ifdef
DRIVER_DATE, which is never defined anywhere. Neither are the macros
referenced within the block: DRIVER_DATE, DRIVER_MAJOR, DRIVER_MINOR,
and DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL. With the struct drm_driver date member going away
anyway, just