Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: Move HPD handling to PHY operations

2017-03-05 Thread Jose Abreu
Hi Neil, On 03-03-2017 09:07, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > The problem is that the HPD/RxSense is tied to this phy_mask and glued into > the > dw-hdmi driver. > > The *real* solution would be to completely separate the HPD/RxSense irq > handling to > a separate driver as a shared irq... > > If Jos

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: Move HPD handling to PHY operations

2017-03-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jose, On Friday 03 Mar 2017 10:05:36 Jose Abreu wrote: > On 03-03-2017 09:07, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > The problem is that the HPD/RxSense is tied to this phy_mask and glued > > into the dw-hdmi driver. > > > > The *real* solution would be to completely separate the HPD/RxSense irq > > handli

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: Move HPD handling to PHY operations

2017-03-03 Thread Neil Armstrong
On 03/02/2017 05:18 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:29:32 Neil Armstrong wrote: >> The HDMI TX controller support HPD and RXSENSE signaling from the PHY >> via it's STAT0 PHY interface, but some vendor PHYs can manage these >> sig

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: Move HPD handling to PHY operations

2017-03-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Neil, Thank you for the patch. On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:29:32 Neil Armstrong wrote: > The HDMI TX controller support HPD and RXSENSE signaling from the PHY > via it's STAT0 PHY interface, but some vendor PHYs can manage these > signals independently from the controller, thus these STAT0 hand

[PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: Move HPD handling to PHY operations

2017-03-02 Thread Neil Armstrong
The HDMI TX controller support HPD and RXSENSE signaling from the PHY via it's STAT0 PHY interface, but some vendor PHYs can manage these signals independently from the controller, thus these STAT0 handling should be moved to PHY specific operations and become optional. The existing STAT0 HPD and