On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Applied the series. Thanks!
Ah, replied to patch 1 before noticing this. Never mind about the
bikeshedding. :)
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Applied the series. Thanks!
Alex
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 9:40 AM Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>
> Instead of manually passing around 'struct edid *' and its size,
> use 'struct drm_edid', which encapsulates a validated combination of
> both.
>
> As the drm_edid_ can handle NULL gracefully, the expli
Instead of manually passing around 'struct edid *' and its size,
use 'struct drm_edid', which encapsulates a validated combination of
both.
As the drm_edid_ can handle NULL gracefully, the explicit checks can be
dropped.
Also save a few characters by transforming '&array[0]' to the equivalent
'ar
