Hi
Am 20.10.22 um 20:37 schrieb Zack Rusin:
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 11:06 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Zack
Am 20.10.22 um 05:41 schrieb Zack Rusin:
From: Zack Rusin
[...]
@@ -1670,6 +1640,10 @@ static int vmw_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
pci_device_id *ent)
if (re
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 11:06 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi Zack
>
> Am 20.10.22 um 05:41 schrieb Zack Rusin:
> > From: Zack Rusin
> [...]
> > @@ -1670,6 +1640,10 @@ static int vmw_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
> > struct pci_device_id *ent)
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_unl
Hi Zack
Am 20.10.22 um 05:41 schrieb Zack Rusin:
From: Zack Rusin
[...]
@@ -1670,6 +1640,10 @@ static int vmw_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
pci_device_id *ent)
if (ret)
goto out_unload;
+ vmw_fifo_resource_inc(vmw);
+ vmw_svga_enable(vmw);
+
From: Zack Rusin
Instead of using vmwgfx specific framebuffer implementation use the drm
fb helpers. There's no change in functionality, the only difference
is a reduction in the amount of code inside the vmwgfx module.
drm fb helpers do not deal correctly with changes in crtc preferred mode
at
