On 2023-07-19 01:01:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 19/07/2023 00:00, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2023-06-29 13:54:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> On 27/06/2023 23:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>> Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. Note that this
> >>> compatible uses the SoC-s
On 19/07/2023 00:00, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-06-29 13:54:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 27/06/2023 23:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. Note that this
compatible uses the SoC-suffix variant, intead of postfixing an
arbitrary number without the
On 2023-06-29 13:54:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 27/06/2023 23:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. Note that this
> > compatible uses the SoC-suffix variant, intead of postfixing an
> > arbitrary number without the sm/sdm portion. The PHY is not
On 27/06/2023 23:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. Note that this
compatible uses the SoC-suffix variant, intead of postfixing an
arbitrary number without the sm/sdm portion. The PHY is not powered by
a vcca regulator like on most SoCs, but by the MX
Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. Note that this
compatible uses the SoC-suffix variant, intead of postfixing an
arbitrary number without the sm/sdm portion. The PHY is not powered by
a vcca regulator like on most SoCs, but by the MX power domain that is
provided via the power-
