Hi Laurent, Morimoto-san,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 08:03:16PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Morimoto-san,
>
> (CC'ing Sakari)
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 04:22:22AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > We have endpoint base functions
> > - of_graph_get_next_
Hi Laurent
Thank you for the review
> Having multiple "ports" nodes in a device node is not something I've
> ever seen before. There may be use cases, but how widespread are they ?
> I would prefer handling this in driver code instead of creating a helper
> function if the use case is rare.
In
Hi Morimoto-san,
(CC'ing Sakari)
Thank you for the patch.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 04:22:22AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> We have endpoint base functions
> - of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint()
> - of_graph_get_device_endpoint_count()
> - for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint(
We have endpoint base functions
- of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint()
- of_graph_get_device_endpoint_count()
- for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint()
Here, for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint() loop finds each endpoints
ports {
port@0 {
(1)
