2014-04-08 0:40 GMT+09:00, Tomasz Figa :
> On 07.04.2014 17:16, Inki Dae wrote:
>> Hi Andrzej,
>>
>> 2014-04-07 23:18 GMT+09:00 Andrzej Hajda :
>>> Hi Inki and Tomasz,
>>>
>>> On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
The code creating the list of components to wait for
(exyno
Hi Andrzej,
2014-04-07 23:18 GMT+09:00 Andrzej Hajda :
> Hi Inki and Tomasz,
>
> On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
> (...)
>> The code creating the list of components to wait for
>> (exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider which sub-drivers are
>> actually enabled in kernel c
On 07.04.2014 17:16, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> 2014-04-07 23:18 GMT+09:00 Andrzej Hajda :
>> Hi Inki and Tomasz,
>>
>> On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>> The code creating the list of components to wait for
>>> (exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider whic
Hi Andrzej,
On 07.04.2014 16:18, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Inki and Tomasz,
>
> On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
> (...)
>> The code creating the list of components to wait for
>> (exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider which sub-drivers are
>> actually enabled in kernel co
Hi Inki and Tomasz,
On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
(...)
> The code creating the list of components to wait for
> (exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider which sub-drivers are
> actually enabled in kernel config.
>
> Are you sure?
>
> exynos_drm_add_components() will try t
Hi Russell,
2014-04-06 17:47 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 01:21:24PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
>> As you may know, there is exynos chip that has two display
>> controllers. So it is possible to compose display pipe lines at same
>> time like below,
>>
>> fimd0-br
2014-04-06 3:31 GMT+09:00, Tomasz Figa :
>
>
> On 05.04.2014 20:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> Not exactly. The approach we found does mostly the same as componentized
>>> subsystem framework but without _any_ extra data in De
I'd be really happy if you gave me such opinions before pull request.
Anyway, below is my comments.
2014-04-06 2:32 GMT+09:00 Tomasz Figa :
> [adding more people and MLs on Cc for further discussion]
>
>
> On 04.04.2014 17:44, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2014-04-04 22:55 GMT+09:00 Tomasz Figa :
>>>
>>>
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 01:21:24PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> As you may know, there is exynos chip that has two display
> controllers. So it is possible to compose display pipe lines at same
> time like below,
>
> fimd0-bridges..--Panel
> fimd1-maybe bridges..-CPU Panel
>
> How we
On 05.04.2014 20:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Maybe my words have been misinterpreted, but all I'm suggesting here is
>> that there is no need to add any new data to DT to solve the same issue
>> to the same extent as componen
On 05.04.2014 20:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Not exactly. The approach we found does mostly the same as componentized
>> subsystem framework but without _any_ extra data in Device Tree. Just
>> based on the list of subsyste
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Maybe my words have been misinterpreted, but all I'm suggesting here is
> that there is no need to add any new data to DT to solve the same issue
> to the same extent as componentized subsystem framework, at least in
> Exynos case
[adding more people and MLs on Cc for further discussion]
On 04.04.2014 17:44, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2014-04-04 22:55 GMT+09:00 Tomasz Figa :
>> Hi Inki,
>>
>>
>> On 01.04.2014 14:37, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch adds super device support to bind sub drivers
>>> using device tree.
>>>
>>> For th
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Not exactly. The approach we found does mostly the same as componentized
> subsystem framework but without _any_ extra data in Device Tree. Just
> based on the list of subsystem sub-drivers that is already available to
> the maste
2014-04-04 22:55 GMT+09:00 Tomasz Figa :
> Hi Inki,
>
>
> On 01.04.2014 14:37, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds super device support to bind sub drivers
>> using device tree.
>>
>> For this, you should add a super device node to each machine dt files
>> like belows,
>>
>> In case of using MIPI
Hi Inki,
On 01.04.2014 14:37, Inki Dae wrote:
> This patch adds super device support to bind sub drivers
> using device tree.
>
> For this, you should add a super device node to each machine dt files
> like belows,
>
> In case of using MIPI-DSI,
> display-subsystem {
> compatib
2014-04-02 23:06 GMT+09:00, Andrzej Hajda :
> On 04/01/2014 02:37 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> This patch adds super device support to bind sub drivers
>> using device tree.
>>
>> For this, you should add a super device node to each machine dt files
>> like belows,
>>
>> In case of using MIPI-DSI,
>>
On 04/01/2014 02:37 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
> This patch adds super device support to bind sub drivers
> using device tree.
>
> For this, you should add a super device node to each machine dt files
> like belows,
>
> In case of using MIPI-DSI,
> display-subsystem {
> compatible =
This patch adds super device support to bind sub drivers
using device tree.
For this, you should add a super device node to each machine dt files
like belows,
In case of using MIPI-DSI,
display-subsystem {
compatible = "samsung,exynos-display-subsystem";
po
19 matches
Mail list logo
