Le 16/09/2024 à 16:35, Tvrtko Ursulin a écrit :
On 16/09/2024 14:32, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
Giving the opportunity to userspace to associate a free-form
name with a drm_file struct is helpful for tracking and debugging.
This is similar to the existing DMA_BUF_SET_NAME ioctl.
Acc
On 16/09/2024 14:32, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
Giving the opportunity to userspace to associate a free-form
name with a drm_file struct is helpful for tracking and debugging.
This is similar to the existing DMA_BUF_SET_NAME ioctl.
Access to name is protected by a mutex, and the 'clien
Am 16.09.24 um 15:32 schrieb Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer:
Giving the opportunity to userspace to associate a free-form
name with a drm_file struct is helpful for tracking and debugging.
This is similar to the existing DMA_BUF_SET_NAME ioctl.
Access to name is protected by a mutex, and the 'clien
Giving the opportunity to userspace to associate a free-form
name with a drm_file struct is helpful for tracking and debugging.
This is similar to the existing DMA_BUF_SET_NAME ioctl.
Access to name is protected by a mutex, and the 'clients' debugfs
file has been updated to print it.
Userspace M
