Hi,
> with more and more patches for TC9595 support got meged into linux-next,
> only a few remain on my patch stack.
>
> This is one of them and is necessary for DP support:
> Tested-by: Alexander Stein
As mentioned in [1] I expect a new version of this series with a
proper documentation update
Hi,
with more and more patches for TC9595 support got meged into linux-next,
only a few remain on my patch stack.
This is one of them and is necessary for DP support:
Tested-by: Alexander Stein
Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2024, 14:26:10 CEST schrieb Marek Vasut:
> Initialize the bridge on attach alre
On 7/16/24 9:50 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? Michael?). If there are no
objections, then I can merge it in a week or two ?
I'll try to use your approach on the tc358775. Hopefully, I'll fi
> Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
> feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? Michael?). If there are no
> objections, then I can merge it in a week or two ?
> >>>
> >>> I'll try to use your approach on the tc358775. Hopefully, I'll find
> >>> som
On 7/12/24 9:16 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? Michael?). If there are no
objections, then I can merge it in a week or two ?
I'll try to use your approach on the tc358775.
On 7/11/24 5:57 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On 11.07.2024 17:38, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 6/26/24 10:02 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
On Wed Jun 26, 2024 at 5:21 AM CEST, Marek Vasut wrote:
Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? M
Hi Marek,
> >> Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
> >> feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? Michael?). If there are no
> >> objections, then I can merge it in a week or two ?
> >
> > I'll try to use your approach on the tc358775. Hopefully, I'll find
> > som
On 11.07.2024 17:38, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 6/26/24 10:02 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
>> On Wed Jun 26, 2024 at 5:21 AM CEST, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
>>> feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? Michael?). If there are no
>>> object
On 6/26/24 10:02 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
On Wed Jun 26, 2024 at 5:21 AM CEST, Marek Vasut wrote:
Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? Michael?). If there are no
objections, then I can merge it in a week or two ?
I'll tr
On Wed Jun 26, 2024 at 5:21 AM CEST, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Thank you for testing and keeping up with this. I will wait for more
> feedback if there is any (Frieder? Lucas? Michael?). If there are no
> objections, then I can merge it in a week or two ?
I'll try to use your approach on the tc358775
On 6/25/24 4:37 PM, Alexander Stein wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2024, 14:26:10 CEST schrieb Marek Vasut:
Initialize the bridge on attach already, to force lanes into LP11
state, since attach does trigger attach of downstream bridges which
may trigger (e)DP AUX channel mode rea
Hi Marek,
Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2024, 14:26:10 CEST schrieb Marek Vasut:
> Initialize the bridge on attach already, to force lanes into LP11
> state, since attach does trigger attach of downstream bridges which
> may trigger (e)DP AUX channel mode read.
>
> This fixes a corner case where DSIM wit
Initialize the bridge on attach already, to force lanes into LP11
state, since attach does trigger attach of downstream bridges which
may trigger (e)DP AUX channel mode read.
This fixes a corner case where DSIM with TC9595 attached to it fails
to operate the DP AUX channel, because the TC9595 ente
13 matches
Mail list logo
