Hi Michał
Applied both patches to drm-misc-next.
Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal
On 8/17/22 18:12, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> Negative tests can be expressed as a single parameterized test case,
> which highlights that we're following the same test logic (passing
> invalid cmdline and expecting drm_m
On 8/18/22 13:19, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:15:39AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/17/22 18:12, Michał Winiarski wrote:
>>> Negative tests can be expressed as a single parameterized test case,
>>> which highlights that we're following the same test logic (pass
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:15:39AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
>
>
> On 8/17/22 18:12, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> > Negative tests can be expressed as a single parameterized test case,
> > which highlights that we're following the same test logic (passing
> > invalid cmdline and expecting drm_mode_p
On 8/17/22 18:12, Michał Winiarski wrote:
Negative tests can be expressed as a single parameterized test case,
which highlights that we're following the same test logic (passing
invalid cmdline and expecting drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector
to fail), which improves readability.
In
Negative tests can be expressed as a single parameterized test case,
which highlights that we're following the same test logic (passing
invalid cmdline and expecting drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector
to fail), which improves readability.
v2: s/negative/invalid to be consistent with other t
