On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:44:30AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.06.25 13:58, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > The only users of pmd_devmap were device dax and fs dax. The check for
> > pmd_devmap() in check_pmd_state() is therefore redundant as callers
> > explicitly check for is_zone_device_p
On 16.06.25 13:58, Alistair Popple wrote:
The only users of pmd_devmap were device dax and fs dax. The check for
pmd_devmap() in check_pmd_state() is therefore redundant as callers
explicitly check for is_zone_device_page(), so this check can be dropped.
Looking again, is this true?
If we ret
The only users of pmd_devmap were device dax and fs dax. The check for
pmd_devmap() in check_pmd_state() is therefore redundant as callers
explicitly check for is_zone_device_page(), so this check can be dropped.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunth
