On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:30 PM Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Le lun., mars 28 2022 at 18:54:25 +0100, Jonathan Cameron
> a écrit :
> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:59:28 +
> > Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >
> >> Enhance the current fileio code by using DMABUF objects instead of
> >> custom buffers.
> >>
>
Hi Jonathan,
Le lun., mars 28 2022 at 18:54:25 +0100, Jonathan Cameron
a écrit :
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:59:28 +
Paul Cercueil wrote:
Enhance the current fileio code by using DMABUF objects instead of
custom buffers.
This adds more code than it removes, but:
- a lot of the complexit
Am 28.03.22 um 19:54 schrieb Jonathan Cameron:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:59:28 +
Paul Cercueil wrote:
Enhance the current fileio code by using DMABUF objects instead of
custom buffers.
This adds more code than it removes, but:
- a lot of the complexity can be dropped, e.g. custom kref and
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:59:28 +
Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Enhance the current fileio code by using DMABUF objects instead of
> custom buffers.
>
> This adds more code than it removes, but:
> - a lot of the complexity can be dropped, e.g. custom kref and
> iio_buffer_block_put_atomic() are not
Enhance the current fileio code by using DMABUF objects instead of
custom buffers.
This adds more code than it removes, but:
- a lot of the complexity can be dropped, e.g. custom kref and
iio_buffer_block_put_atomic() are not needed anymore;
- it will be much easier to introduce an API to export