On 24/04/17 17:25, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> On Monday 24 Apr 2017 13:44:23 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 21/04/17 00:33, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> The is_cache_coherent() function currently returns true when the mapping
>>> is not cache-coherent. This isn't a bug as such as the calle
Hi Tomi,
On Monday 24 Apr 2017 13:44:23 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 21/04/17 00:33, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The is_cache_coherent() function currently returns true when the mapping
> > is not cache-coherent. This isn't a bug as such as the callers interpret
> > cache-coherent as meaning that th
On 21/04/17 00:33, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The is_cache_coherent() function currently returns true when the mapping
> is not cache-coherent. This isn't a bug as such as the callers interpret
> cache-coherent as meaning that the driver has to handle the coherency
> manually, but it is nonetheless
The is_cache_coherent() function currently returns true when the mapping
is not cache-coherent. This isn't a bug as such as the callers interpret
cache-coherent as meaning that the driver has to handle the coherency
manually, but it is nonetheless very confusing. Fix it and add a bit
more documenta
