On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:29:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 09:22:27AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > But do we even need the else part? Assingning &mc_dev->dev is
> > > equivalent to the default per-device set anyway, isn't it?
> >
> > Not quite, the default
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 09:44:35AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 02:42:52PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > .write = vfio_fsl_mc_write,
> > @@ -625,13 +526,15 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device
> > *mc_dev)
> > vdev->mc_dev = mc_dev;
FSL uses the internal reflck to implement the open_device() functionality,
conversion to the core code is straightforward.
The decision on which set to be part of is trivially based on the
is_fsl_mc_bus_dprc() and we use a 'struct device *' pointer as the set_id.
The dev_set lock is protecting th
