On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:12:14PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 05:03:25PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:34:35PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:43:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > The DRM core uAPI hea
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 05:03:25PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:34:35PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:43:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The DRM core uAPI headers are licensed under the MIT license, and carry
> >
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:34:35PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:43:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The DRM core uAPI headers are licensed under the MIT license, and carry
> > copies of the license with slight variations. Replace them with SPDX
> > hea
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:43:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The DRM core uAPI headers are licensed under the MIT license, and carry
> copies of the license with slight variations. Replace them with SPDX
> headers.
>
> Following a discussion with Daniel Vetter on this topic, add a
> clarifi
The DRM core uAPI headers are licensed under the MIT license, and carry
copies of the license with slight variations. Replace them with SPDX
headers.
Following a discussion with Daniel Vetter on this topic, add a
clarification in the drm-uapi.rst file that independent closed-source
userspace imple
