On 8/25/25 2:52 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
On 8/22/25 8:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
It would be great if the commit messages mentioned whether the
identifiers are expected to remain the same
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
>> On 8/22/25 8:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > It would be great if the commit messages mentioned whether the
>> > identifiers are expected to remain the same in the conversion.
>>
>> By
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> On 8/22/25 8:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > It would be great if the commit messages mentioned whether the
> > identifiers are expected to remain the same in the conversion.
>
> By identifiers do you mean if the name of the previous
On 8/22/25 8:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
From: Sidhartha
v1[1] -> v2:
- rebase onto latest mainline v6.17-rc2
- fix build error in patch 1 per Intel Test Robot
This series is part of a project to depcrecate the IDR in favor
of the Xarray. This
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> From: Sidhartha
>
> v1[1] -> v2:
> - rebase onto latest mainline v6.17-rc2
> - fix build error in patch 1 per Intel Test Robot
>
> This series is part of a project to depcrecate the IDR in favor
> of the Xarray. This simplifies the code as locking
From: Sidhartha
v1[1] -> v2:
- rebase onto latest mainline v6.17-rc2
- fix build error in patch 1 per Intel Test Robot
This series is part of a project to depcrecate the IDR in favor
of the Xarray. This simplifies the code as locking is handled by
the Xarray internally and removes the need f
