Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-03-02 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > On 02/28/2017 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Discussions in previous thread lead us to bisectability problem. >> Bisectability in regular driver changes is one thing but in case of >> driver + DTS the gap is much bigger. DTS will go th

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-03-01 Thread Hoegeun Kwon
On 02/28/2017 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: Hi All, [Resend this v2 patches, because i have missing TO and CC.] The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed. Therefore, the current dsi_parse_dt function will

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-28 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > Hi All, > > [Resend this v2 patches, because i have missing TO and CC.] > > The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed. > Therefore, the current dsi_parse_dt function will throw an error, > because there is no linke

[RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-28 Thread Hoegeun Kwon
Hi All, [Resend this v2 patches, because i have missing TO and CC.] The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed. Therefore, the current dsi_parse_dt function will throw an error, because there is no linked OF graph for case such as fimd + dsi + panel. So the 1/5 patch p

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-21 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>> Ideally you are right. DT changes should be no any dependency of driver >>> changes but now Exynos DT is broken. >> >> I didn't receive any bug reports that Exynos DT is broken so I am >> quite surprised hearing that. What do you mean by that?

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-20 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > > > 2017년 02월 20일 16:27에 Krzysztof Kozlowski 이(가) 쓴 글: >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> Can you merge patch 2 and 5 to your tree so that they can go to mainline? >>> Otherwise, I can merge them to my

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-20 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Inki Dae wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > Can you merge patch 2 and 5 to your tree so that they can go to mainline? > Otherwise, I can merge them to my tree if you give me acked-by. Hi, Hm? Why do you need them to be merged? Do you mean that the first patch breaks not

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-20 Thread Inki Dae
2017년 02월 20일 17:55에 Krzysztof Kozlowski 이(가) 쓴 글: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >> >> >> 2017년 02월 20일 16:27에 Krzysztof Kozlowski 이(가) 쓴 글: >>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Inki Dae wrote: Hi Krzysztof, Can you merge patch 2 and 5 to your tree so that t

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-20 Thread Inki Dae
2017년 02월 20일 16:27에 Krzysztof Kozlowski 이(가) 쓴 글: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> Can you merge patch 2 and 5 to your tree so that they can go to mainline? >> Otherwise, I can merge them to my tree if you give me acked-by. > > Hi, > > Hm? Why do you

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-19 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Krzysztof, Can you merge patch 2 and 5 to your tree so that they can go to mainline? Otherwise, I can merge them to my tree if you give me acked-by. Thanks, Inki Dae 2017년 02월 09일 10:26에 Hoegeun Kwon 이(가) 쓴 글: > Hi, > > The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed.

[PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-09 Thread Hoegeun Kwon
Hi, The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed. Therefore, the current dsi_parse_dt function will throw an error, because there is no linked OF graph for case such as fimd + dsi + panel. So the 1/5 patch parse the Pll, burst and esc clock frequency properties in dsi_par