On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:38:02AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> In a wider effort to improve build speeds, we're attempting to split/cleanup
> core headers.
>
> This series attempts to cleanup io.h with "include what you need" approach.
>
> This depends on earlier modifications available in immutab
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, at 17:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:15:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> As you already found, removing an old indirect #include that is
>> no longer needed usually leads to some files breaking. The more
>> impactful your change is in terms of build
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:15:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, at 06:08, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > In a wider effort to improve build speeds, we're attempting to split/cleanup
> > core headers.
> >
> > This series attempts to cleanup io.h with "include what you need" approach.
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:15:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, at 06:08, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > In a wider effort to improve build speeds, we're attempting to split/cleanup
> > core headers.
> >
> > This series attempts to cleanup io.h with "include what you need" approach.
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, at 06:08, Raag Jadav wrote:
> In a wider effort to improve build speeds, we're attempting to split/cleanup
> core headers.
>
> This series attempts to cleanup io.h with "include what you need" approach.
>
> This depends on earlier modifications available in immutable tag[1]. F
In a wider effort to improve build speeds, we're attempting to split/cleanup
core headers.
This series attempts to cleanup io.h with "include what you need" approach.
This depends on earlier modifications available in immutable tag[1]. Feel
free to carry your subsystem patches with it, or let And
