Re: [PATCH v2] panfrost: Properly undo pm_runtime_enable when deferring a probe

2019-10-23 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 8:22 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > When deferring the probe because of a missing regulator, we were calling > pm_runtime_disable even if pm_runtime_enable wasn't called. > > Move the call to pm_runtime_disable to the right place. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso > Reported-by:

Re: [PATCH v2] panfrost: Properly undo pm_runtime_enable when deferring a probe

2019-10-23 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:49 AM Steven Price wrote: > > On 23/10/2019 13:21, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > When deferring the probe because of a missing regulator, we were calling > > pm_runtime_disable even if pm_runtime_enable wasn't called. > > > > Move the call to pm_runtime_disable to the right pl

Re: [PATCH v2] panfrost: Properly undo pm_runtime_enable when deferring a probe

2019-10-23 Thread Steven Price
On 23/10/2019 13:21, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > When deferring the probe because of a missing regulator, we were calling > pm_runtime_disable even if pm_runtime_enable wasn't called. > > Move the call to pm_runtime_disable to the right place. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso > Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsa

Re: [PATCH v2] panfrost: Properly undo pm_runtime_enable when deferring a probe

2019-10-23 Thread Robin Murphy
On 2019-10-23 1:21 pm, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: When deferring the probe because of a missing regulator, we were calling pm_runtime_disable even if pm_runtime_enable wasn't called. Move the call to pm_runtime_disable to the right place. Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Rob

[PATCH v2] panfrost: Properly undo pm_runtime_enable when deferring a probe

2019-10-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
When deferring the probe because of a missing regulator, we were calling pm_runtime_disable even if pm_runtime_enable wasn't called. Move the call to pm_runtime_disable to the right place. Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso Reported-by: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Robin Murphy Fixes: f4a3c6a44b35 ("drm/panfrost