Ping!
Thanks,
Bhaktipriya
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
>> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
>> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
>>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
> just to gain concurrency. Since the workqueue host->intr_wq is involved
> in sync po
System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
just to gain concurrency. Since the workqueue host->intr_wq is involved
in sync point interrupts, and sync point wait and is not being used on
a memory reclaim
