Pushed with small changes to drm-misc-fixes: Renamed patch and added stable Cc
Thanks!
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 11:00 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Unfortunately drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device which is called from both
> drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_rep seem to rely
> on t
Unfortunately drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device which is called from both
drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_rep seem to rely
on that mgr->mst_primary is not NULL, which seem to be wrong as it can be
cleared with simultaneous mode set, if probing fails or in other case.
mgr->lock mutex
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 10:20 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Unfortunately drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device which is called from both
> drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_rep seem to rely
> on that mgr->mst_primary is not NULL, which seem to be wrong as it
> can be
> cleared with si
Unfortunately drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device which is called from both
drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_rep seem to rely
on that mgr->mst_primary is not NULL, which seem to be wrong as it can be
cleared with simultaneous mode set, if probing fails or in other case.
mgr->lock mutex
