On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 04:05:35PM +0800, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
>
> On 2022/4/20 15:51, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:49:48AM +, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> >> If the device is already in a runtime PM enabled state
> >> pm_runtime_get_sync() will return 1, so a test for negative
On 2022/4/20 15:51, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:49:48AM +, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
>> If the device is already in a runtime PM enabled state
>> pm_runtime_get_sync() will return 1, so a test for negative
>> value should be used to check for errors.
>>
>> Also, we need to cal
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:49:48AM +, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> If the device is already in a runtime PM enabled state
> pm_runtime_get_sync() will return 1, so a test for negative
> value should be used to check for errors.
>
> Also, we need to call pm_runtime_put_noidle() when pm_runtime_get_syn
If the device is already in a runtime PM enabled state
pm_runtime_get_sync() will return 1, so a test for negative
value should be used to check for errors.
Also, we need to call pm_runtime_put_noidle() when pm_runtime_get_sync()
fails, so use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead. this function
wil
