Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display enable and disable

2021-11-15 Thread Kuogee Hsieh
On 11/6/2021 9:25 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Fri 05 Nov 16:22 CDT 2021, Kuogee Hsieh wrote: Currently the msm_dp_*** functions implement the same sequence which would happen when drm_bridge is used. hence get rid of this intermediate layer and align with the drm_bridge usage to avoid custo

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display enable and disable

2021-11-12 Thread Kuogee Hsieh
On 11/6/2021 9:25 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Fri 05 Nov 16:22 CDT 2021, Kuogee Hsieh wrote: Currently the msm_dp_*** functions implement the same sequence which would happen when drm_bridge is used. hence get rid of this intermediate layer and align with the drm_bridge usage to avoid custo

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display enable and disable

2021-11-06 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Fri 05 Nov 16:22 CDT 2021, Kuogee Hsieh wrote: > Currently the msm_dp_*** functions implement the same sequence which would > happen when drm_bridge is used. hence get rid of this intermediate layer > and align with the drm_bridge usage to avoid customized implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Ku

[PATCH v2] drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display enable and disable

2021-11-06 Thread Kuogee Hsieh
Currently the msm_dp_*** functions implement the same sequence which would happen when drm_bridge is used. hence get rid of this intermediate layer and align with the drm_bridge usage to avoid customized implementation. Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh Changes in v2: -- revise commit text -- rename d